As Tiger Woods teed off at the US Masters yesterday, Nike launched their latest ad to feature not only the newly-controversial golfing superstar, but, a little spookily, the voice of his dead father, too.
Instead of running a mile from one of their hottest promotional properties when the going got tough (as many a sponsor would; think Kate Moss, Kerry Katona, Peaches Geldof… the list goes on), the global sports and fashion brand has adopted a rather different approach: go for it with all guns blazing. While the likes of Pepsi, and Procter & Gamble’s Gillette brand hit the panic button, pumping out dated, re-cut, re-hashed and Tiger-less ads to fill the void, Nike has taken its own advice: Just do it – boldly standing by their man and slapping the swoosh front-and-centre.
So is this ad, and the strategy behind it, tasteless golfsploitation or marketing genius? So far, opinion is divided. A Yahoo poll is showing 63% (of some 166,000-ish respondents) saying they love it, while a separate vote on celebrity site TMZ finds 77% of 90,000-odd readers calling it marketing bullsh*t.
Read more ›